Mark Carlson wrote: > 3. Currently require targets to have TPGS disabled so that iqn based > names appear in the root device name. The next phase will add > multi-pathing support along with IPMP. > As the Geico Caveman says, "Huh?". (I even look a little like him.)
Could you explain this just for my understanding (actually just the first sentence)? ------- I suspect the file-layout for the server is defined in an existing case. That would be? ------- > 8. dump/sync is only supported on a local partition due to a > networking bug 6205961, which will be addressed in the next > phase. This *seems* like a bit of a serious limitation (the "S" in RAS). Would it be wise to get this "bug" fixed before this case integrates (ie: a dependency)? - thanks, - jek3
