I said Volatile as that is what our RE recommended to me. Having read the Interface Taxonomy it looks to me that Volatile is the normal classification for free or open source software (FOSS) which is what this is.
Padraig Padraig David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: >> Someone might want to build or develop a 3rd party app that uses >> libdaemon. If we don't ship the headers, the only option they have is >> find the same version that is shipped with Solaris and extract the >> headers for themselves. Worse, if they pick the latest version and they >> to use those headers with the old library there is likely to be >> problems. >> >> So interface classification should be Volatile. > > Is there a reason you're using Volatile rather than Uncommitted? The > latter would not allow incompatible versions changes in a patch while > allowing the library to evolve during the creation of a minor release. > > Or is libdaemon really so unstable that Volatile makes more sense? > > dsc
