I agree to the contract..Tim Sparlin
Don Cragun wrote: >> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:45:08 -0500 >> From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:40:42PM -0700, Gary Winiger wrote: >> >>>> Imported interface Classification Notes >>>> =========================== ================= ============== >>>> S-Lang library Uncommitted PSARC/2008/135 >>>> OpenSSL External PSARC/2003/500 >>>> >>> IIRC in today's terms External would have been proceeded by >>> Contracted. Is there a requirement for a contract here? >>> > > PSARC: Yes, a contract is needed and the "External" on OpenSSL should > have been "Contracted Volatile" (although it remains "External" > in the PSARC/2003/500 case materials and in the template > provided for contracts for consumers of OpenSSL). A draft > contract (built from the template in PSARC/2003/500/contracts) > is attached. A copy of this draft contract has also been > placed in PSARC/2003/500/contracts/contract-27. > > Anup: Please reply to this message stating that you agree to the > contract and are willing to sign the contract as the > responsible manager for the SUPPLIER. > > Tim: Please reply to this message stating that you agree to the > contract and are willing to sign the contract as the > responsible manager for the CONSUMER. > > Thanks, > Don >
