C. Bergstr?m wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> While this case seems to dance around some of the possible "rules" >> about EOFs, possibly violating certain Solaris policies, I believe >> that the project team has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure >> that the EOF is unlikely to actually affect anyone. >> >> Therefore I happily give it a +1. Henceforth, let the dead code be >> removed! :-) >> > I wish it didn't, but openjdk requires libXp. Not sure if it matters.
Nope, since the case explicitly said: The libXp library that has been shipped in Solaris since Solaris 7 11/99 is declared obsolete, but at this time we have no plans to remove so that binary compatibility will not be broken. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering