James Carlson wrote: > Jim Walker writes: >> James Carlson wrote: >>> I urge the project team to consider bringing in at least one >>> application that makes use of this library. Libraries without >>> consumers are, in my opinion, just baggage. And in this case, given >>> that the library also represents functional duplication, it doesn't >>> provide much of an offsetting gain. >>> >> We are looking into this already. >> >> I plan to submit the libexosip2 case after this one which is >> required by many of the osip2 apps. > > We already went through that ... libexosip2 isn't an application, > either. I'm suggesting that having a library as the top level > deliverable isn't necessarily an interesting thing.
I understand. We should have a candidate osip2 / exosip2 app soon. The initial app that was driving this case got lost somewhere? I'm still searching the email ;) Maybe these were on the FOSS 500 list. The libraries themselves seemed useful enough to warrant porting on their own. But it is better let the consumer apps drive things more. Cheers, Jim
