> >>> Haven't we always documented uadmin(2) as the wrong way to do that?
> >> I suspect you looked at the page, but for the record, the language is:
> >>
> >> "This function is tightly coupled to the system
> >> administrative procedures and is not intended for
> >> general use."
> >
> > Souldn't this be updated since uadmin now supports suspend/resume?
No. As I've said before uadmin(1m) should be used. uadmin(1m)
will appropriately shutdown services as needed across reboot
and suspend/resume.
> I'd consider that to still hold. sys-suspend(1) is the general
> entry-point.
If this is the PSARC/2009/112 sys-suspend(1), that's fine also.
Though it does have some unresolved bugs. It is an interface
that also will appropriately shutdown services.
There are still issues going forward that the powermanagement
team needs to resolve before there is a fully functional
result. Fortunately this are below the uadmin(1m)/sys-suspend(1)
layer.
Gary..
