James Carlson wrote:
> Scott Rotondo writes:
>> Assuming that identifier length isn't a significant constraint, you
>> could spell out "transient" instead of using "np." But I think Jim's
>> suggestion above, which doesn't require any suffix, is a more natural
>> way to express this idea.
>
> The two are actually separate issues. I should have made that
> clearer.
>
> If there's a convenience function, then it'll still need a name and
> (as a tiny nit only) I think avoiding "_np" might be a good idea.
Thanks for clarifying that. I thought fastreboot_disable_np was the
proposed name for the property group.
Scott
--
Scott Rotondo
Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies
President, Trusted Computing Group
Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278)
