Vasumathi Sundaram writes: > To cite Andrew Gallatin from the thread, > "...in general, I agree there should be some way to change what > stateless offloads are in use at runtime. Solaris is way behind > here. For example, the BSDs do it via ifconfig (to disable > TSO on "mxge0": ifconfig mxge0 -tso), Linux does it via the > horribly cryptic ethtool (to disable TSO on eth2: > ethtool -K eth2 tso off)."
People may want to do it, but isn't it merely a hack? If TSO/LSO/mumbleSO is working right, then why would a user ever need to care? Isn't this sort of like tweaking memory allocation algorithms or PCI register values from the command line? If it's just a hack, why not expose it at a lower stability level? -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677