Brian, This case was closed approved during LSARC business.
Thanks, John On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:42, Brian.Lu at Sun.COM wrote: > On 11/27/08 06:32, Edward Hunter wrote: > > Thanks. Now I get to ask a question about the case. :-) > > > > One of the big "surprises" with Firefox 3.x is that "clear private > > data" does not actually clear all your browsing history. There is > > an ugly work around for involving editing your configuration > > directly with about:config. By any chance does 3.1 make this > > better? > > > > While I would not derail this case for that, it does appear to have > > some privacy implications and while that may be okay when I just > > download it from Mozilla maybe we want the Solaris version to be > > more conservative (aka doing what I want). > > -edh > > > The bug has been fixed. see > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329741 > > Brian > > > On 11/26/08 14:16, John Fischer wrote: > > > Ed, > > > > > > Due to the overwhelming explanation I withdraw my concerns. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > > > > > > John Fischer wrote: > > > > > > > > > Actually the copyright information is added by sac_nextcase. > > > > > Perhaps we should modify that when the case is open. > > > > > > > > > That was intentionally added by plocher when he did the mods to make > > > > open > > > > cases - it always used to have the information protection warning > > > > before, > > > > since the mods, if the case is open the header instead says Copyright > > > > Sun, > > > > if the case is closed it instead has the information protection warning > > > > (which I won't name here since it would make this case closed due to the > > > > filters). > > > > > > > > What problem do you see in stating that Sun owns the copyright on the > > > > one-pager/review form? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > > > > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > > > > > > > > > > > >
