Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:51 +0800, Cecilia Hu wrote: >> The architecture and interface of it are clear enough to be a self >> review, so the case is marked as "closed approved automatic". > > I think that now that drivers affect system-wide administratively > visible behavior unrelated to their immediate function such as the > system's ability to do suspend/resume and fast-reboot, I think some more > details are needed beyond what was originally provided. > > Does the driver have proper support for DDI_SUSPEND in its detach() > routine, and for DDI_RESUME in its attach() routine? Given that it's > USB, does it even need to for the system to suspend/resume with such a > device? > > Similar question for quiesce() and fast-reboot. > > All device driver cases should probably include such details to preempt > these kinds of questions.
Good points and I agree. Those parts should be included in further driver cases. About this one, urtw, AFAIK: . suspend/resume: supports . quiesce and fast-reboot: supports . brussels: supports -- Cecilia.Hu at Sun.COM +86-10-62673947
