Mark Martin ??: > chenpu wrote: >> Hi James, >> >> Thanks for the comments. >> >> James Carlson ??: >> >>> Is Lucene delivered in a way that others can use it? Should it be? >>> >> Lucene will not be use on server side. That means it will not be >> delivered to Opensolaris. >> > > Hmm, where is the server side source sitting? Seems sort of like > delivering a closed project to me, or perhaps 1/2 closed. As James > mentioned, what about admins who want to run this inside a firewall? All the source code( both for Client App and Web Service) will be hosted on OpenSolairs.org. See OSR #10383,
https://opensourcereview.central.sun.com/app?action=ViewReq&traq_num=10383 > >>> That helps, but what case describes the rest of the project? Should >>> this case be dependent on (or at least reference) the rest of the >>> project? >>> >>> I still don't quite see how the proposed project is "obvious" enough >>> to be a fast-track. Why not run a full case for it? >>> >> Thanks for the suggestion, James. Can you help to be sponsor for this >> case? Or we can get somebody's help on this? >> > > I'll volunteer to intern. Thanks. Regards, Jeffrey > >> Regards, >> Jeffrey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opensolaris-arc mailing list >> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org >
