James Carlson wrote: > ... > >Yep; understood. You'd end up with separate command line flags if you >did that, just as IPv6 does today. > >My point in saying this is that the design looks incomplete. It looks >like you've added L2 (Ethernet, really; nothing else seems to be >supported) to a single configuration file, but the equivalent work for >IPv6 hasn't been done yet, so the design is "mixed" and confusing as a >result. > >
Unless I'm mistaken, it will cover two out of the three supported MACs: ether and wifi (the odd man out being ib.) The "family" keyword will be reused when it comes time to do the merging of the two protocols and it is necessary to allow address-less rules to map. >All of the L2 examples you've provided use IPv4. What would happen if >I needed to add L2+IPv6 rules? Can I do that? > > Yes, you can. Darren
