David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: >>> TCPWrap [/usr/sfw/lib/libwrap.so.1.0 && friends only] >>> LibEXIF [/usr/lib/libexif.so.12.0.1 && friends only] >> >> Both of these are then just broken and should be fixed. >> I believe libwrap was introduced in 2000/488. The discussion >> there about Big Rules not applying does not seem to extend to >> exclude 64 bit libraries. >> Sigh... Seems like bugs for the SFW consolidation to fix. > > Agreed (in the case of libexif, it actually comes out of the JDS > consolidation as far as I know). But I think fixing these bugs and > delivering a 64-bit PHP5 is outside of the scope of this particular > case since there is clear demand for a 32-bit PHP stack at this time.
THIS case is about Apache and since Apache appears to have all its 64 bit dependent libs already then THIS case should deliver 64 bit. The PHP case can't if the dependencies aren't there and I don't think that the project team delivering PHP should be on the hook for fixing the missing 64 bit libs. -- Darren J Moffat
