On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>> hi, I would like to repeat my question since this is something I'm
>> not sure how to solve - is /usr/sfw/bin/openssl link to /usr/bin/openssl
>> then neccessary or can I not to create it?
>>
>> how would that work if /usr/sfw would be just full of symbolic
>> links? Would it go away completely after some time or would we have to keep
>> delivering them?
>>
>> thanks, Jan.
>
>Well, since this is the first detailed case in the slow death of /usr/sfw,
>it gets to propose and we get to decide.
>
>I think you will need to deliver the link. You certainly will need to
>deliver the link as long as there is a conflict between the commitment
>level and the release binding. It could probably be deleted by the
ok, I'm just noting that the creation of the link is not in the
onepager. Of course it's not a problem for me to create it if decided.
thanks for info, Jan.
--
Jan Pechanec
