Peter Memishian wrote: > > I'm not asking for a redesign with this case, but the current scheme can > and should be improved upon, and if we do that we will probably need to > declare what's being defined here (and the other similar tunables) as > obsolete (or just yank them entirely, depending on the perceived impact). >
I guess some assessment needs to be made of how much scripting users are likely to have done based on the current set of linkprops. The current names were clearly chosen to be consistent with stats. and older drivers' ndd tunables. I think there is some merit in a newer scheme as you suggest, but consistency with older names/tools is clearly a good thing. Paul -- ============================== Paul Durrant Senior Staff Engineer Solarflare Communications Inc. ==============================
