PSARC members, I'm looking for a +1 endorsement for this project before I can close out this case as approved.
There was discussion on whether this project should combine with the existing bzip2 application, but we understand that because these two programs behave differently [1][2][3] and this combined functionality doesn't already exist, the majority of those responding [2][4][5][6] agreed it wasn't a requirement of the project team to make these changes and that the project team could provide pbzip2 as a new separation integration. Disagreement came from one replier [7]. Can we get the +1 endorsement for the specification as originally provided or does the project team need to update their materials in some way? Thanks. [1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015241.html [2] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015217.html [3] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015221.html [4] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015218.html [5] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015219.html [6] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015232.html [7] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2009-April/015231.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: pbzip2 [PSARC/2009/247 FastTrack timeout 04/27/2009] Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:25:51 -0700 From: Rich Burridge <rich.burri...@sun.com> To: PSARC-ext at sun.com CC: John Sonnenschein <John.Sonnenschein at Sun.COM> I'm sponsoring this case for John Sonnenschein. The requested release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the materials directory. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: proposal.txt URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090427/ed0800b1/attachment.txt>
