John Plocher writes: > Ali Bahrami wrote: > > Note that there are two emacs variants in wide use, GNU emacs, > > and Xemacs. This case is for GNU emacs only. > > > > SUNWemacs > > SUNWemacs-el > > SUNWemacs-x > > SUNWemacs-nox > > > Given that there will probably also be a call for having Xemacs, > wouldn't it be better to use package names that make it obvious > which one this is? Maybe SUNWgnuemacs or GNUemacs or ....
It probably shouldn't be "GNUemacs," unless Mr. GNU is building the package. A deeper question is the value of integrating something that we know from the outset will be essentially a frozen snapshot dust collector due to Sun's internal legal issues. Wouldn't it be better to have someone outside of Sun who isn't afraid of GPLv3 do the work? -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
