I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system.
I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension.
Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http request.
Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request.
Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same time.
I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your assumption.
Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888?
Or I just add an example as pen:http, and then ask user to do their own
instances when they need?
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren J Moffat
Sent: 08/06/08 17:13
> Jia Ni wrote:
>> We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now.
>> Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. As it
>> doesn't analyze application layer protocol, so it can't be used in both
>> PASV and PORT mode.
>
> I don't understand why you can't have to instances of the SMF service
> one configured for ftp on the ftp port and one configured for http on
> its ports. This would be two different pen processes. I'm pretty sure
> that would work given the documentation for pen, or am I missing
> something really fundamental about pen in that only a single process can
> exist on a given system ?
>
--
Best regards,
Jia
