Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:51:52PM +0800, Aaron Zang wrote: >> Nicolas Williams wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:22:15PM -0700, Gary Winiger wrote: >>>> The project team now considers the "rootunlock" property as unnecessary >>>> because: >>> Hmmm, and what if root has no password? >> Here we are proposing to eliminate the "rootunlock" property. So if without >> the "rootunlock" property, user can not unlock the screen using root >> password. >> It does not matter if root has password or not. >> >> Or I didn't understand your question correctly. > > What I meant is that the prospect of root not having a password too > makes rootunlock pointless :)
Ahhhh, it should count for one additional reason that we are doing this. Thanks. -- aaron -- You know some birds are not meant to be caged, their feathers are just too bright.
