Brian Gupta wrote:
> I will not be replacing the vim binary, or associated links. I will be
> providing a set of files that will coexist with the files, links and
> directories provided by SUNWvim. My understanding is that two
> different SUNW packages can not have conflicting files. If they could,
> I might have taken a different approach. IE: Provide alternate
> packages, similar to how the Debian folks do it. vim-tiny, vim,
> vim-full, such that depending on which package you installed,
> /usr/bin/vim can have different compile options.
You *could* also extend this case to include redelivering the
vim package(s), and redesign that area as well if it would result
in a "better" system. Of course, it also makes things a bit harder,
so it is entirely your call...
-John
