E-mail's fine. The case was approved at PSARC this week anyway.
-- Garrett
Brian Gupta wrote:
> :)
>
> Yeah instability is the word. Do I have to submit a new draft, or is
> this email affirmation sufficient?
>
> -Brian
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Garrett D'Amore <gdamore at sun.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think the point here is that releases of gvim have historically not
>> introduced new incompatibilities.
>>
>> (Indeed, it would seem that there would be little that the editor would
>> likely be able to do that would break interface
>> compatibility, without seriously breaking its compatibility with legacy vi,
>> which is one of its major selling points.)
>>
>> -- Garrett
>>
>>
>>
>>> 3.1.1 Interface stability
>>>
>>> Vim/gvim has no obvious history of any interface stability and the
>>> expectation
>>> is is that dot-dot releases of gvim will be compatible.
>>>
>> I wonder if something is wrong with that sentence. Did you mean to say
>> *in*stability? (If so, tell the ARC and the case directory;
>> I'm just lurking.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
