Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> (That said, I recently noticed that plans are afoot to obsolete dladm
>> show-dev as part of clearview. I certainly hope they are going to
>> provide a reasonable alternative, though I've not looked too closely.)
>
> You'll get a chance to look closely. That part of Clearview
> (2006/499) is scheduled for commitment review on June 20th.
>
> In any case (no pun intended), Clearview plans to obsolete show-dev
> (but keep it for now for backward compatibility), and replace it with
> show-phys which will have information such as media type, link state,
> link speed, duplex state, etc... This is part of 2006/499 and not
> this case, so any comments on this should be made as part of the
> review of 2006/499.
Thanks, and I've gone ahead and read the proposal there as well ... it
all looks good to me. :-)
-- Garrett
