No objections from me at least - I think you're fine to close the case. Hugh.
Irene Huang wrote: > Hi, Hugh > > Hugh McIntyre wrote: >> It's not clear from the public materials if you'll be shipping a man >> page or not. It's also not clear from the webkit.org sources whether >> these have man pages - it looks like the answer is no. > From the pkgmaps attached, the project does not ship manpage for now. >> >> In any case I think it's up to you want to do. If you ship >> documentation that says "HTTPS is not enabled by default" then it's up >> to you if you explain why or not. I thin you can either: >> >> - not mention WEBKIT_IGNORE_SSL_ERRORS at all. > >> - or if you do mention it, you should say that it's insecure and >> probably also should be considered obsolete (.ie. may go away in >> future?). > in the future if manpage is to be shipped for libwebkit, I'd prefer > option two. > Alfred and Chris, what's your opinion? > > Now that most of the questions seem to be answered, I don't see the > necessity of having a meeting (if I understand correctly). > If there's no objections, I would like to close this case within 24 hours. > > Thanks for all the comments :) > > --Irene >> >> Either option is OK with me. > >
