John Fischer writes: > While the API will be classified as volatile for this document, > the plan is to maintain backward compatibility in future releases.
A nit, perhaps, but those two clauses are saying different things. The classification system *is* a statement of intent. If there's an intent to maintain backward compatibility in future releases, then "Volatile" doesn't express that intent. I hope this isn't being classed as "Volatile" merely because it's written by a third party. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
