Jyri Virkki writes: > What I don't want to see is a situation where Sun prevents the vast > majority of non-Sun applications from having working LDAP support on > Solaris (and only on Solaris since they all are known to work fine > with OpenLDAP elsewhere) simply because Solaris org hasn't figured out > their internal LDAP strategy. It's the kind of thing which prevents > Solaris from being taken seriously by developers and deployers.
I completely agree. I just do not agree that ignoring the problem will in fact solve it. Our job here isn't to figure out business strategy or how to pay for the projects needed; it's to review architectural changes to a system. Where the system is lacking in architecture, we're obligated to complain about it. If we don't, then we have no function. If "do what everybody else does without regard to overall architecture" is indeed the intended strategy, then let's just not bother with the fiction of architectural review. It's not as though this is the only thing on my plate, or even the thing most important to my management chain. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677