Jim: >>>> If these interfaces are intended for Solaris users to make use of, >>>> then should the interfaces be Uncommitted rather than Volatile? It >>>> doesn't seem much good to provide interfaces for providing dialogs >>>> via shell scripts if the interfaces might change or break. >>>> >>> As matter of fact, dialog is just a executable utility which is for >>> OpenSolaris. That's the reason why I defined it as Volatile. >> >> This doesn't seem like a good argument to me. I still don't see >> the value in adding interfaces that users are expected to use, that >> we also tell them we may change in an ad-hoc fashion. >> > Could it be ok if I change it to Uncommited? I'll check if those > interface change a lot recently in community.
If the interfaces are being maintained in a stable fashion upstream, then Uncommitted would make more sense, I think. I'd check with the external community and maintainer. Brian
