On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:46:16PM -0800, Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >
> > > > What's the relationship of this SQLite3.x case with the SQLite 3.x
> > > > case still open as LSARC/2008/059?
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:55:07AM +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
> > > As I understand it, this project supersedes that project.
> > 
> > Yes, it does.  I don't know when LSARC/2008/059 will be so marked, but
> > it will be.
> 
> It does seem odd a new case comes superseding the old one in such
> short notice but ok!

Did you read the e-mail record for that case?

> Please send an email to the old case (i.e. lsarc-ext with subject
> containing "LSARC/2008/059") stating that case is superseded by this
> one, so there's a pointer in the mail log explaining what happened.

It's my intention that either I or John Fischer will do that.  We've not
decided when -- e.g., when this case is approved, perhaps.

The mail record for LSARC/2008/059 should already have e-mail indicating
that the i-team ceded the case to me and that I'd either take it over or
file a new case.

> Also work with the case owner so it gets marked closed superseded.

See above.

Reply via email to