Garrett D'Amore wrote: > +1. > > Do we really need to introduce a new set of RBAC authorizations for > this? I'd have guessed that low-level sys_devices or whatever access > would have been sufficient.
I agree with Garrett, auths here is the wrong model an exec_attr entry with the relevant privileges is a better match here. Adding the auths requires forking the code base for no reason and provides no real benefit over an exec_attr entry. -- Darren J Moffat
