Phi Tran writes: > >> Not sure if we're reviewing these bits here (isn't that for the later > >> LSARC case?), but, as a nit, I wouldn't make package names > >> "Committed," but rather Uncommitted. > > I thought package names should be Committed due to this document: > http://sac.sfbay.sun.com/cgi-bin/bp.cgi?NAME=stability.bp > Package names are Committed because other packages and customer > Jumpstart profiles must reference them.
Interesting point; that BP should probably be revisited. Package dependencies are a bit in the air right now. In any event, I'd be happy with any value here. We've used "Uncommitted" in many cases, but I don't think it's actually significant, so it's just a nit. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
