Thanks Lubos.  I am fine with the networking answer.

The only other thing is to put an attributes section in the
man page.

I have no other issues.

+1 from me.

Margot


On 03/23/09 11:45, Lubos Kosco wrote:
> Margot Miller wrote:
>   
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> Uncommitted is more consistent with other ARC cases for package name
>>
>> SUNWopengrok                 Committed               Package name
>>   
>>     
>
> will change ( I registered the name hence I made it committed ;) )
>
>   
>> Attributes section needed in man page.
>>
>>
>> And, could you elaborate more on this from the checklist:
>>
>>       
>>     3.4.6 General Security Questions
>>       (see 
>> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/security-questions/ 
>> for details)
>>       Are there any network protocols used by this project?
>>       [X] Yes
>>       [ ] No - continue with the next section (section 3.5)
>>       
>>       Do the components use standard network protocols?
>>       [ ] Yes
>>       [X]  No - ARC review required
>>   
>>     
>
> opengrok web application (the thing you basically see on
> http://src.opensolaris.org )
> uses a port listening on localhost only (default conf) which can accept
> an object then deserialize it into a configuration object
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/src/org/opensolaris/opengrok/configuration/Configuration.java#362
> - it is used to "refresh" the configuration of web application from
> recent indexing without need to restart web container (glassfish or tomcat)
>
> hence I marked it as non standard protocol, but basically it's a TCP
> socket listening for java objects ...
>
> hope this explains
> Lubos
>
>   
>> Thanks
>> Margot
>>
>> Margot Miller wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> Please don't close this yet until we get a "+1" from someone.
>>>
>>> I am reviewing it now.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Margot
>>>
>>> Brian Utterback wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> The timer has expired and I didn't hear any objections, so I am 
>>>> marking this as closed, approved.
>>>>
>>>> Brian Utterback wrote:
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Okay, any other comments? The timer has expired and I am inclined to 
>>>>> close this as approved. Anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lubos Kosco wrote:
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Darren J Moffat 
>>>>>> <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Brian Utterback wrote:
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> I am sponsoring the enclosed fast track for Lubos Kosco. The 
>>>>>>>> timer is set to March 17th.  Proposal, checklist and man page are 
>>>>>>>> enclosed for review.
>>>>>>>> This project requires the installation of Exuberent CTags, LSARC 
>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>> 2008/741. The man page provided is not actually for a command 
>>>>>>>> called opengrok. Instead opengrok is intended to be customized 
>>>>>>>> for each use, so there is an example wrapper script provided in 
>>>>>>>> /usr/share/doc/opengrok and the man page documents the usage of 
>>>>>>>> this script.
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Has the swing based GUI gone away and we only have the webapp ?
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> Only webapp and cli search work; GUI wasn't used and no one wanted 
>>>>>> to maintain it, hence it was dropped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> L
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Darren J Moffat
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>   
>>     
>
>   


Reply via email to