"Garrett D'Amore" <gdamore at sun.com> wrote:
> Ah, just saw this -- so the case is now withdrawn rather than derailed.
> I presume there is a real desire to have star at least, on Solaris
> systems. If so, I hope you'll either come back with a fasttrack without
> the controversial rmt (to me at least) rmt replacement, or will work
> with the upstream supplier to remove the portions of the program that
> are most controversial. ("access" control and supporting configuration
> file.)
I see no controversional parts.
I see however missunderstandings and questions from people who most likely
did not ask if they did know how rmt is used.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
