Darren Reed wrote:
> One could argue that the original daemon() does not offer much flexibility
> and that this approach to daemonization is actually not sufficient in SMF
> world. While this is true, it is out of scope of this case to provide modern
> alternative.
While providing an alternative interface is both out-of-scope, and missing
the point of providing a BSD/Linux compatible interface, have you discussed
with the SMF team whether daemon() should be putting the process into a new
process contract?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
