Darren, The reason why I thought that the naming was fine was because it fits into the current naming convention for TX JDS stuff. This is a while in Rome do as Rome type of thing for me.
John Darren J Moffat wrote: > John Fischer wrote: >> $ tsoltjds-getlabel --min=admin_low --max=admin_low \ >> --default=public --accredcheck=y --mode=clearance \ >> --format=internal > > The arguments look fine. The command name is a bit clunky and not what > I'd expected. > > My suggested alternate names are: > > usr/bin/select-label > usr/bin/txlabel > usr/bin/txselectlabel > > On the other hand the name from the presented spec is pretty much in > line with the rest of the TJDS suite so if no one else objects to the > name I wouldn't hold this case up. >
