Garrett D'Amore wrote: > This looks like a potentially handy feature, and the architecture seems > fairly straight-forward. However, I'm not sure it qualifies for > self-review. (Although the bar for self review seems to be moving > somewhat...) If only because it introduces new interfaces and behavior > for consumers. > > I'd suggest that this maybe should be a fast-track instead of self > review, unless there is some particular rush to get this case through? > Please consider promoting it to a fast track. In any case, I'll happily > give it a +1.
Given this is being included explicitly for compatibility with GNU ld there is nothing ARC can change anyway. It is only a +1 or rederail and vote no type of case. So I really don't see the point in adding pointless extra process for a case like this. -- Darren J Moffat
