Mark A. Carlson wrote:
> a +1 is not a vote. It's original purpose was to indicate that
> *in the absence of any visible review* - someone had reviewed
> it and was OK with the case. Prior to this, cases were slipping
> through approved without such an indication.
>
> Unless the case mail file is empty (save for the project proposal)
> you don't need a +1 to close the case.
Huh?!? While the purpose of the +1 is to indicate that review occurred,
I've interpreted that it is still necessary because it indicates that
the review occurred *and* the reviewer is satisfied with the results.
I don't think its a good idea to let cases get approved just because
someone sends a comment about the case (which might or might not
indicate a real review occurred.)
- Garrett
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- mark
>
> petede wrote:
>> From reading of the case - the questions raised appear to have been
>> answered by Petr and the time out has passed.
>>
>> However I have not seen a +1 here..
>>
>> Thanks
>> pete
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensolaris-arc mailing list
>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
>
> --
> <http://www.sun.com> * Mark A. Carlson *
> Sr. Architect
>
> *Systems Group*
> Phone x69559 / 303-223-6139
> Email Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM
>
>
>
