On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:59:42PM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> We'll have to agree to disagree.  Debating this further on this list is 
> not productive though; the case is withdrawn.  (And never was the case 
> denied, merely "derailed".  Your reactions to derailing could be seen as 
> overreacting, actually.)  Please either drop PSARC, or drop the 
> conversation.  I'm more than happy to debate it *off* of the main PSARC 
> alias.

I understand what de-railing means.  I'm reacting mostly to the
withdrawal of the case.  But also, when it comes to FOSS, the ARC can't
be de-railing too often, else the process will be unbearable, which is
partly why I asked if it wouldn't be better if all non-core FOSS always
went through /contrib first: partly because the ARC would be less
relevant to FOSS then, partly because the i-teams would get instant
gratification, partly because it'd give the potentially controversial
cases time to soak.

Reply via email to