Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:16 -0800, Cathy Zhou wrote: > >> I think it can be implemented either way. But my understanding of the >> precedent examples, is that, the administrators has to enable the >> services explicitly in order for the service to work, for example, the >> ILB service. >> > > The existing best practice would seem to be that the service is disabled > until _some_ explicit administrative opt-in enabling action is > performed. Whether that's a "svcadm enable ..." incantation, or > something else that implicitly enables the service would both adhere to > the best practice (the ypinit command is one example of the latter as it > implicitly enables appropriate network/nis/* services). In the latter > case, to be symmetrical an implicit disable mechanism should also exist > when the feature is disabled or when the software determines that the > service is no longer needed by the implementation. > Okay then. I will update the case material and let you know.
Thanks - Cathy > >> If we agreed we do not need to follow such precedence, I can change how >> VRRP works. >> > > -Seb > > >
