Mike,
 Thanks to you and the team for following up on this, and making the 
interfaces general to
virtualization, rather than LDOMs specific. I believe that will lead to 
a better user experience.
I have re-reviewed this, and offer a +1.
--
Rick

Mike Christensen wrote:
> On 01/13/10 15:55, Rick Matthews wrote:
>> There was no meeting scheduled for Jan. 13.
>>
>> I believe a question was asked (and if not, I'll ask it) as to why an 
>> LDOMs specific
>> virtualization query? Would there be a query that could give the 
>> caller "generic" virtualization
>> information (working for both Zen and LDOMs)? Was this considered?
>>
>> Could a generic call identify the virtualization technology, and
>> then, if needed, technology specific queries could be made?
>> -- 
>> Rick
>
> After discussions with the Xen group, I have reworked this proposal
> to cater to Xen (and other virtualization technologies) implementing
> this.  This involved mostly name changes (e.g. libldoms in the
> original proposal is now libv12n, function names are now
> v12n_* rather than ldoms_*, and manifest constants are now
> V12N_*) and new bit(s) in the v12n_capabilities function to return
> virtualization implementation technology.
>
> The case materials in the directory have been updated and attached
> is the new case.  Thanks.
>
> Mike


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Matthews                           email: Rick.Matthews at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc.                  phone:+1(651) 554-1518
1270 Eagan Industrial Road              phone(internal): 54418
Suite 160                               fax:  +1(651) 554-1540
Eagan, MN 55121-1231 USA                main: +1(651) 554-1500          
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to