Darren J Moffat wrote: > On 29/01/2010 16:49, Daniel Hain wrote: >> Could we get a +1 to allow the project team to move ahead or do we need >> to wait for the next meeting for the litany (or other objections)? > > What I sent was equivalent, I don't actually have to type '+1'. >
Thanks ... Lukas >> The project team is eager to move forward integrating this into Nevada >> before the window of opportunity for S10U9 soak/backport closes. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dan >> >> On 01/28/10 10:31 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: >>> Having discussed this offline with some people the following is my >>> suggestion to move this forward. >>> >>> Samba can integrate with a private copy of the Mozilla 6 LDAP for >>> Solaris 10 U9 onwards. >>> >>> Until such time as there as an active project team and a stated >>> direction (hopefully an ARC inception review) for updating the the >>> current libldap.so in OpenSolaris Samba can carry a private copy of >>> the Mozilla 6 LDAP there as well. This is on the assumption that the >>> Samba project team will work with any future LDAP project team for >>> OpenSolaris to ensure that the needs of Samba are considered in >>> changing the system libldap. >>> >>> While this is less than ideal given the desire to quickly get an >>> updated Samba into Solaris 10 U9, where there is no in kernel CIFS >>> server, I think this is the best that this project team can be >>> expected to do. >>> >> >> > >
