Or even better which drivers aren't supporting quiesce on the system in 
question.

On 2/3/2010 3:38 PM, Margot Miller wrote:
> mm14424 at opensolaris:~$ pfexec reboot -f dryrun
> reboot: not all drivers have implemented quiesce(9E)
> mm14424 at opensolaris:~$
>
> It would be more customer/system admin  friendly to state something
> like "Fast reboot not supported on this machine" rather
> than above message which assumes some knowledge
> of device drivers and driver entry points.
>
> Margot
>
>
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> On 02/ 3/10 11:12 AM, Sherry Moore wrote:
>>> Garrett,
>>>
>>> It was by your request during PSARC review that "reboot -f dryrun" to
>>> be a project private interface and therefore not to be documented in
>>> the man pages.
>>
>> Hmm.. ok.  I don't remember rightly why I would have requested that, 
>> but I presume I had a reason for it at the time.
>>
>> Perhaps its a good time to revisit that decision, since there seems 
>> to be some desire to have the ability to query this.
>>
>>     - Garrett
>>
>>> Sherry
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:32:37AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>> On 02/ 3/10 09:59 AM, Calum Mackay wrote:
>>>>> On 03/02/10 17:38, chris kiick wrote:
>>>>>>>>> How do I tell if my system has the "specific capabilities"
>>>>>>>>> required for
>>>>>>>>> fast reboot? Is there a command which can be run, or a
>>>>>>>>> particular line in
>>>>>>>>> prtconf, prtdiag or the like which tells me whether the
>>>>>>>>> system is capable
>>>>>>>>> of fast reboot?
>>>>>>>> reboot -f dryrun shows whether your system is capable at all.
>>>>>>>   Lovely. Is that documented anywhere? I don't see it in the
>>>>>>> man page for
>>>>>>>   reboot(1M). Seems like an ideal extension to the text you
>>>>>>> proposed along the
>>>>>>>   lines of "To see if your system is capable of fast reboot,
>>>>>>> run reboot -f
>>>>>>>   dryrun".
>>>>>> dryrun only works on x86.
>>>>> I don't see it mentioned in reboot(1) on an x86 system either.
>>>> Its "undocumented", and IIRC, was not formally ARC'd as an interface.
>>>>
>>>>      - Garrett
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> calum.
>>
>

Reply via email to