Closed this case as 'closed approved'. On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:49 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: > This case was approved at the LSARC meeting today. > > However, I was unable to mark the IAM file "closed approved fast-track > 02/16/2010" because the IAM file is write-only by Jeff Cai. Can this > be corrected so the IAM file can be updated? Or, Jeff, can you update > the IAM file? > > Jeff, note that you should make sure that the files in case directories > have 644 permissions so other ARC members can modify these files.
ok. Jeff > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > On 02/10/10 10:52, John Fischer wrote: > > +1. > > > > John > > > > Jeff Cai wrote: > >> If the final scheme is out, we will change the proposal with the new IPS > >> names. > >> > >> John, > >> Will you +1 for this case? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:44 -0800, John Fischer wrote: > >>> Danek, > >>> > >>> I am fine with that too. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>> > >>> On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > >>>> John Fischer wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Simon, > >>>>> > >>>>> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... > >>>>> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of > >>>>> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: > >>>>> > >>>>> image/viewer/eog/plugins > >>>>> > >>>>> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team > >>>>> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. > >>>> I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a > >>>> pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for > >>>> the > >>>> existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back > >>>> anyway. > >>>> > >>>> If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they > >>>> should > >>>> make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on > >>>> pkg-discuss with those two copied. > >>>> > >>>> Danek > >> > >> >
