On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Garrett D'Amore <gdamore at sun.com> wrote: > On 02/22/10 11:28 AM, Roger A. Faulkner wrote: >> >> I am sponsoring this automatic case for myself. >> > > +1 on the case, on the justification for not expanding to 64.
-1 for this case. I did some research on this subject and I disagree that increasing the number of signals to 64 breaks binary compatibility. sigset_t is a limited resource but there are still 24 signals left *and* if there is ever the need to add more signals the number of realtime signals can be reduced again. However I strongly believe that there will no such demand before SunOS 6.x where sigset_t can be expanded. IMO the case can pass with 64 realtime signals, otherwise I request a derail and full case which explains why again a resource is increased in a half hearted manner. Irek
