"Roger A. Faulkner" <raf at jurassic.sfbay.sun.com> wrote:
> So what this case boils down to is, should the number of realtime
> signals be increased to 32 or to 64? (Or some other number --
> why is no one suggesting 48?)
Don't ask such a question, a similar question in the past did lead to "53" ;-)
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
