On 03/11/10 03:17 PM, Don Cragun wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 11:42:30 -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>
>> SInce nobody else has said so explicitly yet, +1 on the case, and +1 on
>> just needing the single case. (I.e. I'm +1'ing both the announce in S10
>> and the removal in OpenSolaris.)
>>
>> - Garrett
>>
> Garrett,
> I think you're missing the point. The case as written announces the
> removal of MySQL 4.0 from S10 and removes MySQL 4.0 from S10 as a
> patch. I believe everyone that has commented so far would be happy
> if the case announced the future removal with a patch or micro binding,
> but had a minor release binding for the actual removal of the product
> rather than a patch binding.
>
> Removing an old, supported interface as part in a patch is NOT
> appropriate!
>
Oh, I misread that... I thought the case was only proposing to announce
the removal in S10. Actually *removing* it in S10 is not really
appropriate, removing it in the next release is fine.
So I'm going to have to retract the +1 that relates to the removal in
S10. A removal in SNV is OK. (Assuming it already hasn't happened.)
- Garrett
> - Don
>
