On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote: > It would be easy enough for me to print a 'time' column as the first > column, and the output could then be sent to 'sort -n'. I'm not sure > how people feel about that. Is that cheating? :-) The alternative > is to AVL sort by that time, which as you note will increase the > footprint, perhaps dramatically for a really big diff.
I'd be happy with that. Someone suggested a -o field1,field2,..,fieldN option, and that's starting to look desirable. There's at least these fields that you could include in output: - object number - object type - timestamp* - generation number - type of change (create*, unlink*, rename*, other*, other meta-data, data) - old path* - new path* - link count* The starred ones are the ones included in your proposals so far. I'd be happy with just those; the others would be icing :) Nico -- _______________________________________________ opensolaris-arc mailing list opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
