On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 20:04 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> On 17/06/2010 19:29, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > I don't think it is necessarily true that these decisions or review, or
> > even a review of the process itself, have to be in the "open", but I do
> > think that it is probably best if there is at least an internal closed
> > review covering the process used to manage this list in the final
> > product. One hopes there is a documented process somewhere! For the
> > purposes of this case, a link (even one only available internally) to a
> > document describing the process would IMO satisfy the architectural
> > considerations.
>
> There is a process internally, but I won't post the link to this case.
>
Can you at least post it somewhere where the other internal ARC members
can see it, or tell them how to verify the process if they should
need/want to?
That said, I'm satisfied that this case does not need any further review
of its own.
- Garrett
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
