> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 04:12:19PM -0700, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > Do you use AF_INET or AF_UNIX sockets? > > > > I'd guess that these are AF_UNIX sockets. It looks similar to bug > > > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6227895 or > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6249138 > > Yes, it is AF_UNIX. However, I'm not sure a close() is at work here. > (It could be; but I can't make heads or tails out of the bug > descriptions available to the public.)
Do you call shutdown(3SOCKET) on one half of the endpoint? > I'll see if I can load up the current Solaris Express code next week on > a test machine here - should sol-nv-b19 be recent enough? Yes, it includes fixes for all AF_UNIX bugs known so far. You may be hit by a new one, also. > Any idea when the S10 port will be available? Is there any workarounds > that we can implement? (This is biting a lot of folks.) If you call shutdown() for halves of the endpoint the workaround is to avoid doing this. Otherwise the workaround is to use kernel/drv/tl (or kernel/drv/ sparcv9/tl or kernel/drv/amd64/tl) from either earlier or later Solarises. - Alexander Kolbasov. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
