Stephen Lau wrote On 08/22/06 11:09,: > Rich Teer wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alan Hargreaves wrote: >> >> >>>Oh if only it were that simple. Unfortunately it's not. I've got code working >>>for producing the bits, I need to keep testing each time a code drop happens >>>(and I really need to test sparc properly), but other than that it's ready >>>for >>>code review. >> >>Given that (presumably) the Solaris bits are shipped in non-debug mode, >>can you please give us some more details as to why building the open >>bits in non-debug mode causes so much grief? I take it that it's not >>as simple as just changing an option in a Makefile... >> >>Curiously, >> > > > Bonnie - are there any redistribution/licensing issues with building and > distributing non-debug closed-binaries?
No. Licensing a non-debug version of the ON closed-binaries should be the same as for the debug version. Thanks. Bonnie > > cheers, > steve > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
