Stephen Lau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:06:09PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote: > > >I agree that 'janitor' fails to capture the point here, but I'm not sure > > >that > > >the only thing in scope is automated detection tools. To me that seems too > > >narrow. To me the scope should be wide enough to encompass classic bits of > > >kernel cleanup like the "vmem" rewrite as well as discussions of what we > > >might ultimately want to retire from the system. > > > > > >Do you have a better idea for a name? I've been ruminating on this over > > >the weekend, but haven't come up with anything worth sharing. > > > > Sanitation engineer? > > Custodian? > > Caretaker? > > Gardener? > > how about: > > cruft cleanup crew
What about "Cruft Cleanup Taskforce" (there is more stuff ToDo than just compiler warnings...) ? :-) ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
