John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:03:27AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > Grumpf... that's unfortunate since it adds some complexity to the code > > and ruines the idea to exploit exactly this feature in the OS/Net > > codebase. The OS/Net code, both kernel (yes, I know... kernel threads > > Well, you were asking for a workaround, I suppose that not using VLA is it.
Or use |alloca()| ... but the idea was to use more C99 features in the OS/Net tree instead of using the old cruft. > It's also probably pretty easy to fix (and we'd need the DWARF fix too for > when > GCC is the primary compiler). As I mentioned to Rich Lowe, I don't remember > the > vla syntax used by SS11 being in the stabs spec, so we'd need to ask one of > the > compiler people where the syntax came from and what its spec is. > > Note that we just need to do a simple parsing of the stab as we throw it away; > it's not something that ends up being used in the resultant CTF. Is there a way to get the patch and land it together as part of the ksh93-integration tree ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
